Its not always about survival rates, the impact of morbidity and mortality is a much more important consideration.
I know of nowhere in the developed world where the entry to practice standard is as low in EMS as it is in the United States.
After 14 years of developing the "EMS Agenda for the Future" it is dissapointing that 200 hours of education and the ability to basically do nothing is acceptable.
The National Scope of Practice model says a basic EMT can administer oxygen, oral glucose and aspirin.
The National Scope of Practice model says an Advanced EMT can cannulate and administer GTN, salbutamol, entonox, IM adrenaline (anaphylaxis), glucagon, glucose and naloxone.
... and this is somehow not neglegently inadequate and the best you could come up with after fourteen years when Australia, Ireland and New Zealand could achieve more in less than ten?
Sorry guys I don't mean to bust your balls and I have some appreciation of various issues such as the size of the country and variation of systems you have to work with but OMFG!
And before we get carried away into a skills pissing match, you can teach any idiot to slip in a drip and pop an amp of something but it takes a true clinican to do it properly.