Being me, and knowing where my loyalty is, I have to add my two cents. One of the people hotly involved in this debate is unable to back any of his opinions up with facts, studies, or documented proof of any sort. The other educated person involved in this debate has not only named sources for reference, but has been involved in at least one research project (probably several more then I know about) that changed a protocol where I practice. I'm more willing to side with a person that has proven himself through practice, research, involvement, and commitment to providing the highest in care then someone that skirts around every issue presented. It seems to me that a certain person here likes to argue for the sake of argument, even if he is unable to support said arguments. He commands the English language, twisting into an oblivion in an attempt to make it seem he is intelligent or has a clue. It's my opinion, and only my opinion that if you no longer practice, you no longer participate. We're no longer living in the "good ole days" and I frankly could care less how good a paramedic you think you were. You feel you need to have an opinion about an issue, be prepared to back it. Studies are done for a reason.
DG - Got my snail mail today. Excellent article this quarter, ironic how part of it shows up here. My interest is not so much with the LBS, but with the cervical collar itself. What I'd like to know is if we can re-invent the egg. A few designs of cervical collars have come across my career, and I have yet to see one I actually think does a good job. In an age where are patients are getting heavier, and necks are getting wider, the design seems outdated. Is there a better way to restrict the c-spine then what we've been using? I'm very interested in the effects of the design we have on suspected brain injury patients. Do you know of any research about it? I'm interested in it, and I'd love to be involved in studying it further.