Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I want to know some oppinions on what this rhythm is.

CC: Resp. Diff. - 86 y/o F.

EKG.jpg

It looks to be sinus tach with ST depression and T wave inversion, possibly indicative of ischemia. See a few PVCs in their too, but too much of a wandering baseline and can't really tell from the photo if it's regular or not, could you scan it instead of photographing it?

Posted

Please try to include the 12 lead measurements, pr interval, qrs duration. Could be a LBBB, then is it a new BBB or existing?

Posted (edited)

Holy hypertrophy!

-Looks like we have a regular, wide-complex tachycardia at a rate of about 150 with the occasional (probably ventricular) ectopy.

-There appear to be P-waves of consistent morphology and a regular PR interval.

-The mean QRS axis is within the normal range and R wave progression through the anterior leads is good.

This is likely an atrial tachycardia with LBBB abbarancy. The standout part of the ECG though is definitely the huge QRS amplitude, which is probably due to hypertrophy. Both the left bundle and the hypertrophy are factors that mess with the ST segment, so this ECG is non-diagnostic for ischemia/infarct without more info from the story/presentation.

What kind of machine printed that 12 lead by the way? Its weird.

Edited by fiznat
Posted
I want to know some oppinions on what this rhythm is.

CC: Resp. Diff. - 86 y/o F.

EKG.jpg

Clearly it is A-Fib with a rapid ventricular response. From what I can see, the QRS interval is within normal limits, that and your axis is normal which rules out a left bundle branch block with aberant conduction. The best thing I can come up with based on what I can see is A-Fib with a rapid ventricular response and left ventricular hypertrophy. The hypertrophy would present with inverted ST segements, especially in AvL, V-5, V-6,, which your strip has. I don't see anything malignant here other than the rate.

Posted
Holy hypertrophy!

-Looks like we have a regular, wide-complex tachycardia at a rate of about 150 with the occasional (probably ventricular) ectopy.

-There appear to be P-waves of consistent morphology and a regular PR interval.

-The mean QRS axis is within the normal range and R wave progression through the anterior leads is good.

This is likely an atrial tachycardia with LBBB abbarancy. The standout part of the ECG though is definitely the huge QRS amplitude, which is probably due to hypertrophy. Both the left bundle and the hypertrophy are factors that mess with the ST segment, so this ECG is non-diagnostic for ischemia/infarct without more info from the story/presentation.

What kind of machine printed that 12 lead by the way? Its weird.

It is a Phillips monitor, not sure of the exact model

Posted
Clearly it is A-Fib with a rapid ventricular response. From what I can see, the QRS interval is within normal limits, that and your axis is normal which rules out a left bundle branch block with aberant conduction. The best thing I can come up with based on what I can see is A-Fib with a rapid ventricular response and left ventricular hypertrophy. The hypertrophy would present with inverted ST segements, especially in AvL, V-5, V-6,, which your strip has. I don't see anything malignant here other than the rate.

What are you smoking ? AFIB ? hope you were joking. Regular Rhythm, p waves before every complex.

Posted
Clearly it is A-Fib with a rapid ventricular response. From what I can see, the QRS interval is within normal limits, that and your axis is normal which rules out a left bundle branch block with aberant conduction. The best thing I can come up with based on what I can see is A-Fib with a rapid ventricular response and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Ah, what?

This is definitely not a-fib. There are clear p waves preceding each QRS and the rhythm is without a doubt regular. Let me show you:

notfib.jpg

The red lines indicating the R-R interval are all of the exact same length (they are cut + paste versions of each other). The short red lines are underlining the p waves.

Also, the QRS is likely wide, although I admit it is difficult to tell exactly since we can't see the small boxes very well. If it isn't wide then it is close to wide, which qualifies for an incomplete LBBB at the least. While an axis deviation is sometimes seen in the presence of left bundles, it certainly is not an absolute criteria nor a rule-out. Remember LVH is supposed to cause a left axis as well, but there is definitely LVH in this ECG. The normal axis doesn't rule out anything.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...