Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

  • Baylor study doubts neck brace standard
    In some cases, device might hurt accident victims

    By TODD ACKERMAN
    Copyright 2010 Houston Chronicle
    Jan. 23, 2010, 10:48AM

    Applying a brace to the neck of a trauma patient, standard procedure for
    many decades, can worsen the injury and lead to severe paralysis or death,
    according to a new study by Houston researchers.

    Baylor College of Medicine doctors used cadavers to confirm that so-called
    cervical collars can be counterproductive, a finding that could upturn the
    way emergency medical personnel and doctors act to stabilize and protect the
    upper spine in potentially fatal neck injuries, such as those that commonly
    occur in bad automobile accidents.

    "This study is a proof of concept that in cases of severely unstable neck
    injuries, cervical collars are not only not helpful, but harmful in many
    situations," said Dr. Peleg Ben-Galim, a professor of orthopedic surgery and
    the study's lead author. "More research needs to be done, but it might be
    that we can prevent some of the deaths and quadriplegia that occur in these
    injuries."

    The study appeared this week in the Journal of Trauma.

    Dr. David Persse, medical director of Houston's Emergency Management
    Services, called the study "compelling" and "concerning" and said it will
    come up for discussion at the annual meeting of the nation's 30 largest EMS
    departments in Dallas next month. But he also said he doesn't want to
    overreact.

    "We need to look at this thoughtfully before we change the standard of
    care," said Persse. "It concerned a particular kind of injury. It may apply
    to other injuries as well, but we don't know that yet."

    But Persse added that he understands the need to act quickly, that "it's not
    like a lot of areas where there's not as serious downside to waiting for the
    next study."

    Car-crash victims
    Ben-Galim said cervical spine injuries are found in the autopsies of up to
    94 percent of people who die in car crashes, which claim about 44,000 U.S.
    lives annually. There are about 11,000 people annually who survive spinal
    cord injuries.

    There is no obvious alternative to cervical collars, though hospitals often
    place sandbags under the back of the patient's head and, less commonly, some
    EMS teams at the scene of the crash wedge the head of the patient between
    foam bolsters on the backboard.

    The injuries in question involve the area where the brain connects to the
    spinal cord. Doctors treating such injuries work to stabilize the ligaments,
    muscle and bone to prevent secondary injury and to protect the brain stem
    and cord.

    Baylor researchers undertook the study after a case in which a broken jaw
    precluded the use of a cervical collar on the survivor of a car wreck
    brought to Ben Taub. When the doctors started to put a collar on the
    patient, fluoroscopy showed two of the patient's vertebrae separate, causing
    doctors to immediately remove the collar. The treated patient ultimately
    walked out of the hospital on his own.

    Ben-Galim noted that there are other such case histories in medical
    literature.

    To study the phenomenon, Baylor researchers made an incision in cadaver neck
    ligaments based on patient X-rays, then simulated clinical scenarios by
    applying cervical collars and putting the bodies in ambulances and driving a
    distance.

    In all of the cadavers, imaging technologies found that the collar increased
    the rupture.

    In effect, the collars pushed the head away from the shoulders, Ben-Galim
    said.

    He said the rupture stretching occurs because of both the application of the
    collars and their continued use.

    One national expert called the study interesting but said he wasn't sure it
    would one day change the standard of care.

    "There are certain cases, like the ones in this study, that can be
    dangerous, but they're rare - most people who suffer high neck injuries die
    immediately," said Dr. Tom Scaletta, the past president of the American
    Academy of Emergency Medicine. "I think the study's importance will be to
    raise awareness about the special care that must be taken - preserving
    patients' normal head position, making sure they're not having difficulty
    breathing."

    Anecdotal cases
    Dr. Walter Lowe, director of the Memorial Hermann Sports Medicine Institute
    and team physician for the Houston Texans football team, said the study
    wouldn't change the care of injured football players removed from the field
    in collars and on stretchers because those injuries tend to involve lower
    areas of the spine.

    Ben-Galim said that since the study was undertaken, Ben Taub doctors have
    saved patients with severe neck injuries by loosening or removing cervical
    collars early and rushing them to the operating room, but he acknowledged
    such cases are anecdotal.

    He said the research team looked at 400 articles and found no scientific
    evidence that cervical collars can stabilize severely unstabilized spine
    injuries.

I found this quote interesting:

...less commonly, some

EMS teams at the scene of the crash wedge the head of the patient between

foam bolsters on the backboard.

Is this really less common these days? I've been out of the street medicine field for awhile, so it's an honest question.

Posted

Is this really less common these days? I've been out of the street medicine field for awhile, so it's an honest question.

No it;s not uncommon... Ever patient I board gets foam head-blocks as part of the stabilization. I've never seen a fully immobilized pt brought to any ER locally without those blocks.

  • Like 1
Posted

I found this quote interesting:

Is this really less common these days? I've been out of the street medicine field for awhile, so it's an honest question.

Having just gone through the NREMT courses for EMT-B and EMT-I, I can tell you that they're still stressing the uses of 'head blocks', CID (Cervical Immobilization Devices) and other similar devices to immobilize the cervical spine when the patient is placed on the backboard.

They stress that the person holding the head/neck in a 'neutral, in-line position' does NOT release until the head is between those blocks (just as it's always been?)

Could that quote have been in reference to the patient's head in the CID/headblocks but with no cervical collar in place?

Posted (edited)

Is this really less common these days? I've been out of the street medicine field for awhile, so it's an honest question.

Not from what I've seen. Head beds are always used. The question could be, does the author know that there are different styles of head beds besides the big orange Ferno blocks? If you aren't sure what you're looking for, it could be easy to miss a different style/brand of head bed than what you're expecting to see.

Edited by JPINFV
Posted
Could that quote have been in reference to the patient's head in the CID/headblocks but with no cervical collar in place?

Good point! That may have been what they meant. Of course, since we're talking about Houston FD EMS, anything is possible. When your paramedic school is a whole 10 weeks long, you're likely to see anything happen.

  • Like 1
Posted

So much to question about this study as it relates to changing field procedures that I can't even start...

Well maybe start, yes... which kinds of collars did they use, what was their training on the collars, what positions where cadavers in, what percentage of patients have the specific types of spinal injuries that caused injuries in the lab, what was the rest of their immobilization like (head wedges, "cheese blocks", towels, none?).

And yes, using a lateral head immobilization device is still standard of care. Haven't heard of a place that doesn't use them.

Posted

Good point! That may have been what they meant. Of course, since we're talking about Houston FD EMS, anything is possible. When your paramedic school is a whole 10 weeks long, you're likely to see anything happen.

I do believe they are up to twelve weeks now.

  • Like 1
Posted
There is no obvious alternative to cervical collars, though hospitals often

place sandbags under the back of the patient's head and, less commonly, some

EMS teams at the scene of the crash wedge the head of the patient between

foam bolsters on the backboard.

Yeah, I agree Dust, this quote kind of took me by suprise too. My immediate reaction was, what hospital uses sandbags under the pt's head? Is this common practice where anybody works? Actually, our service doesn't use foam blocks, we use blanket rolls. Same difference. Its an interesting study, of course a lot more research needs to be done on the issue.

There are certain cases, like the ones in this study, that can be

dangerous, but they're rare - most people who suffer high neck injuries die

immediately,"

However, this quote somewhat limits the application of the study. Is it reasonable to change practice for an injury that few patients actually survive?

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...