Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The problem with kiwi's data is what do you do with that in the US? It's apples and oranges. I think it's great that down there they have a great success rate, but like he said, they have medics with 6+ years of training and lots of experience. So I don't know what to do with that data when deciding if my medics (when I'm a med director) who have a year of training and 6 months of experience should be able to RSI.

I also think the need for RSI is going to go way down as more ambulances get BiPAP. It's reducing the number of tubes we're doing in the ER. And I think RSI is sorta an all or nothing thing. Either you are doing it all the time (like at least monthly) or you shouldn't get to do it. I don't want my medics trying to do RSI once a year.

Posted

RSI is very handy to have for e.g. critical asthmatics, poorly oxygenating post-seizure or post-cardiac arrest and some severe trauma

It does however represent disproportinate clinical risk and is not something to be handed out lightly, its not like putting in a drip.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...