Jump to content

What do you feel about the Evidence Based Medicine philosophy  

13 members have voted

  1. 1.

    • It subverts clinical decision making
      0
    • Its a good idea and more people should use it
      11
    • I would use it but i dont know enough about research
      0
    • Theres not enough research into it
      0
    • Whats evidence based practice?
      1
    • Its a good idea but its far to hard to implement
      0
    • I dont care - some one else write my protocols for me
      0
    • Its an excuse for cost cutting by management
      0
    • Expert opinion and clinical decision making is a better option
      1


Recommended Posts

Posted

the answers to select from were extrapolated from several research papers into GP's, Nurses, Midwives, and Physiotherapists attitudes towards EBP.

I took the common attitudes towards EBP in all the papers and posted them here, i was just seeing if the PHC answers would be similar to the others

Posted
Agree with both of the above.

Although, in the US, it really isn't very common for it to be applicable to a Paramedic, who work primarily from written protocols that they are not allowed to stray from. One of the most satisfying things about my current position is that I am given a great deal of latitude with my clinical decision making and can choose from a variety of medications for any given condition, based upon what I feel is best for this particular patient. But yes, that is an extremely dangerous way to go if you are not basing your decisions upon sound, research based evidence.

Dust, wouldn't you say though that more EMS protocols are being driven by evidence based medicine these days? If they aren't, they damn well should be.

Argee with Rid, tniuqs and Dust that evidence based medicine is the ONLY way to go otherwise it's all Voodoo.

Posted
Dust, wouldn't you say though that more EMS protocols are being driven by evidence based medicine these days? If they aren't, they damn well should be.

I do agree that better systems base their protocols on current literature and evidence. But even in those systems, there is commonly a "one size fits all" approach that keeps medics within a rigid protocol framework, and does not allow for clinical decision making that may yield better therapeutics for a given patient.

We see it here on EMT City all the time. Medics quoting their protocol as if it were the Holy Grail of medicine, when in fact it is inappropriate for the situation at hand, yet that medic remains blissfully ignorant of that fact and smugly satisfied with himself because he successfully, yet mindlessly, followed the recipe in his little cookbook.

Protocol is not evidence, even if it is evidence based.

Posted

That's why here, we don't have 'protocols' they are called Medical Control Guidelines because they recognize no call or guideline is black and white, it's all grey.

For example, we are encouraged (read, you are stupid not to) to do a 12 lead prior to administering nitro to rule out RVI and to also do a 15 lead in the presence of inferior changes and/or if elevation is present in V1.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...