Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
What I failed to appreciate was that CHF patients sometimes have a compensatory bronchoconstiction. They are basically giving themselves PEEP. They are attempting to keep enough pressure in their alveoli to hold out a tidal wave of edema. When my partner bronchodialated this patient, she could no longer hold back the fluid.

An excellent analogy. Fortunately, prior to getting my ALS license I learned from a veteran medic the dangers if Albuterol in the CHF patient. I've yet to have a wheezing CHFer whose wheeze was not relieved by nitro and Lasix. (By protocol I can get away with skipping the Albuterol, can't avoid the Lasix yet.)

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I am a member of the EMS steering committee for my fire and rescue department. We brought up the topic of removing furosemide from the rigs earlier this month. It will be brought up again next month and I fully expect we will decide to remove it. In the pre-hospital setting, we feel like the evidence is mounting that it has the potential for harm and little potential to help.

Posted
I am a member of the EMS steering committee for my fire and rescue department. We brought up the topic of removing furosemide from the rigs earlier this month. It will be brought up again next month and I fully expect we will decide to remove it. In the pre-hospital setting, we feel like the evidence is mounting that it has the potential for harm and little potential to help.

Really? You must be in a pretty urban setting for Alaska then.

I've seen Lasix work miracles in rural settings with extended transport times.

Posted

He is in Juneau....

Cant get very rural when you are on a small island....

I say this as a former Ketchikanite.

Now when I was in Nome, different story.

Posted

Really? You must be in a pretty urban setting for Alaska then.

I've seen Lasix work miracles in rural settings with extended transport times.

What you say is interesting, because many of the veteran paramedics I've run into swear by Lasix in the rural prehospital environment. In MD, it is now like a 4th or 5th tear drug and only with medical direction. High-dose nitro sublingually is first line, followed by CPAP, transdermal nitro (Nitrobid), captopril, and then Lasix.

What I was taught was that furosemide doesn't reach peak effect for over an hour and "should" show little effect in the prehospital environment. Clinically, I would say, most paramedics disagree.

Posted

The peak effect you speak of is for the diuresis. Lasix is a most useful vasodilator, and achieves this rather quickly. Lasix can make the bad situation worse, but NTG by itself is not always a good answer either. Even adding some doses of morphine have proven effective in the cases that I've needed them.

Nothing quite like working the nursing home CHF patient that has actually aspirated liquid nutrition (Ensure). Direct tracheal suctioning never looked so creamy. :lol:

Posted

had a guy with multiple gsw's, hypotensive, air hungry, left cx sounded clear, right was completely silent....dropped a needle in his r cx, no change, turns out i had a small tear in the tubing of my stethoscope where the bell attaches, when i listen over the left, the tear was closed, to reach over to his right caused it to open, resulting in no sound transmission through the diaphram...didn't change his long term outcome (dead) but was a misdiagnosis i was a bit embarrassed about....

Posted

Can't really prove it wasn't there to begin with though. :oops:

Posted
The peak effect you speak of is for the diuresis. Lasix is a most useful vasodilator, and achieves this rather quickly. Lasix can make the bad situation worse, but NTG by itself is not always a good answer either. Even adding some doses of morphine have proven effective in the cases that I've needed them.

Nothing quite like working the nursing home CHF patient that has actually aspirated liquid nutrition (Ensure). Direct tracheal suctioning never looked so creamy. :lol:

First off, I'd like to edit my last post:

Tier...instead of tear. Duh. I don’t like this new 90 minutes to edit thing.

Secondly, good point. I was just presenting what I've been told in instruction. There was a great crusade down here against Lasix during the last protocol roll out and it may be true that they pumped their chest a bit to give EMS providers a reason to hate it. I had rather forgot about the initial vasodilatory response. I did know that it does sometimes potentiate the effects of other PO antihypertensives.

Posted

My understanding of the thought process behind removing lasix is not that's it's not a good drug to use but that's often times given when the provider mistakes pneumonia for CHF.

Lasix to a pneumonia patient doesn't do him/her much good. Not that this needs saying in this crowd. :lol:

-be safe

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...